Shreyanka Patil: What Her Current Official Record Tells Us

Shreyanka Patil’s official record is easiest to understand when her franchise role and India selection are kept separate. The available primary sources establish who she is, where she fits, and why a squad announcement should not automatically be read as proof of tournament participation.

So, who is Shreyanka Patil?

Royal Challengers Bengaluru’s official player profile describes Shreyanka Patil as an all-rounder from Karnataka and records her date of birth as 31 July 2002. That is the clearest identity marker in the current primary record: an Indian player associated with both domestic and franchise cricket, rather than a profile built on unverified popularity claims.

What does her WPL record actually show?

The official TATA WPL 2026 retention announcement lists Patil among Royal Challengers Bengaluru’s retained players. Together with the RCB profile, it confirms her franchise connection for the 2026 season.

The useful distinction is what the announcement does not establish. Retention confirms that the franchise kept her in its squad plans; it does not, by itself, prove that she appeared in every match or describe her performance. Those would require match-specific records.

What does her India record establish?

The BCCI squad announcement named Shreyanka Patil in India’s squad for the ICC Women’s T20 World Cup 2026. A later BCCI update records that Prema Rawat replaced her after Patil was injured.

Read together, those two notices show an initial selection followed by a change to the tournament squad. They should not be compressed into a claim that Patil played in the competition. Selection, replacement and match appearance are three different facts.

The practical takeaway

A careful answer is that Shreyanka Patil is a Karnataka all-rounder identified by RCB, retained by the franchise for WPL 2026, and initially selected in India’s 2026 T20 World Cup squad before the BCCI recorded her replacement.

That framing is more useful than treating every team-list mention as evidence of performance. For runs, wickets or appearances, the relevant evidence would be an individual match record—not a retention notice or an initial squad announcement.